Southart v. Dwight

2 Sandf. 672
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedDecember 15, 1849
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Sandf. 672 (Southart v. Dwight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Southart v. Dwight, 2 Sandf. 672 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1849).

Opinion

Sandford, J., (after advising, with two of his associates,)

held that the affidavit of the defendant did not make a sufficient answer to the application of the plaintiff. A party, to excuse himself from making a discovery of any papers alleged on oath by the adverse party, to be in his possession, must make an affidavit in the terms prescribed by the revised statutes, and swear positively that the papers are not in his possession, or under his control. He must make such an examination as to enable him to do this ; or state facts with his denial when expressed as it is here, which will show that such denial is equivalent to the positive oath required by the statute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Sandf. 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southart-v-dwight-nysuperctnyc-1849.