Southard v. Salerno

113 A.D.2d 927, 493 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52553
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages and for a permanent injunction arising out of defendant’s alleged interference with plaintiff’s use of her business premises, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), dated December 10, 1984, which failed to grant a preliminary injunction and which vacated a temporary restraining order which had been granted on November 29, 1984.

Order affirmed, with costs.

[928] The record shows the existence of a sharp question of fact as to the ownership of the delicatessen business at issue in the case. Under the circumstances, it was not an abuse of discretion for Special Term to refuse to grant a preliminary injunction and we see no reason to substitute our own discretion for that of Special Term. Lazer, J. P., O’Connor, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southard v. Salerno, 113 A.D.2d 927, 493 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52553 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

113 A.D.2d 927 (Southard v. Salerno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kazantzis v. Cascade Funding RM1 Acquisitions Grantor Trust
191 N.Y.S.3d 8 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)