Southard v. Johnson

158 So. 169, 117 Fla. 666
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 17, 1934·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*667 Per Curiam.

This case is before us on writ of error to review the judgment of .the Circuit Court of the First Judicial Circuit in and for Walton County.

The record fails to show exceptions taken to the order of court overruling motion for new trial. In fact, the record fails to show any order of court made on the motion or that the same was' ever brought to the attention of the court, except in the bill of exceptions.

Because of the state of the record, we cannot say that reversible error has been made to appear.

The judgment should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J., and Ellis, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southard v. Johnson, 158 So. 169, 117 Fla. 666 (Fla. 1934).

158 So. 169 (Southard v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Yoder v. Adriatico
459 So. 2d 449 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
City of Pompano Beach v. Edwards
129 So. 2d 144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)