Southall v. Quam

North Dakota Supreme Court

Southall v. Quam

277 N.W. 604, 68 N.D. 195, 1938 N.D. LEXIS 95

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 7, 1938

DocketFile No. 6479.

StatusPublished

This text of 277 N.W. 604 (Southall v. Quam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Southall v. Quam, 277 N.W. 604, 68 N.D. 195, 1938 N.D. LEXIS 95 (N.D. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Action in claim and delivery to recover possession of a horse sold by one Martin Mickelson to the defendant. Plaintiff claims title under the contract involved in the case of Southall v. Mickelson, just decided by this court, ante, 191, 277 N.W. 601. Upon the trial in District Court the two cases were consolidated but separate judgments were entered. The animal in this case is involved in the accounting action of Southall v. Mickelson, and, since it was there held that Mr. Mickelson was the owner of the horses described, the decision in that case is decisive of this.

Judgment of the District Court should be affirmed.

CHRISTIANSON, Ch. J., and NUESSLE, and BURR, JJ., and MILLER and JANSONIUS, Dist. JJ., concur.

MORRIS, J., disqualified, and BURKE, J., being detained by illness did not participate, Hon. HARVEY J. MILLER, Judge of Sixth Judicial District, and Hon. FRED JANSONIUS, Judge of Fourth Judicial District, sitting in their stead.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action in claim and delivery to recover possession of a horse sold by one Martin Mickelson to the defendant. Plaintiff claims title under the contract involved in the case of Southall v. Mickelson, just decided by this court, ante, 191, 277 N.W. 601. Upon the trial in District Court the two cases were consolidated but separate judgments were entered. The animal in this case is involved in the accounting action of Southall v. Mickelson, and, since it was there held that Mr. Mickelson was the owner of the horses described, the decision in that case is decisive of this.

Judgment of the District Court should be affirmed.

CHRISTIANSON, Ch. J., and NUESSLE, and BURR, JJ., and MILLER and JANSONIUS, Dist. JJ., concur.

MORRIS, J., disqualified, and BURKE, J., being detained by illness did not participate, Hon. HARVEY J. MILLER, Judge of Sixth Judicial District, and Hon. FRED JANSONIUS, Judge of Fourth Judicial District, sitting in their stead.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 N.W. 604, 68 N.D. 195, 1938 N.D. LEXIS 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/southall-v-quam-nd-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack