Southack v. Gleason

49 Misc. 445, 98 N.Y.S. 859
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 15, 1906·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court had power to so amend the proceedings as to turn the action into one against the defendants individually. Boyd v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co., 84 App. Div. 466. The summons, however, should have been amended, as well as the complaint; and an amendment of the latter, alone, is ineffectual and cannot be sustained.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with leave to plaintiff to make such motion in the court below as he may be advised.

Present: Scott, Giegeeich and Gbeenbaum, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with leave to plaintiff to make such motion in court below as he may be advised.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southack v. Gleason, 49 Misc. 445, 98 N.Y.S. 859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

49 Misc. 445 (Southack v. Gleason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boyd v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.
84 A.D. 466 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)