South v. State

135 S.W. 1177, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 627
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in South v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 72 Tex. Crim. 381
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 22, 1911·Published

Opinion

HARPER, J.

Appellant was tried upon complaint and information charging him with being a vagrant, in that he habitually associated with prostitutes, and habitually loitered in and around houses of prostitution. Upon a trial he was convicted, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $100.

There are neither bills of exception nor a statement of facts in the record. The indictment charges an offense, and the court submits this offense in his charge to the jury. It is presumed that the court submitted the law, and all the law, applicable to the testimony.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

South v. State, 135 S.W. 1177, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 627 (Tex. 1911).

135 S.W. 1177 (South v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.