South Shore Yacht Club v. State Liquor Authority

34 A.D.2d 794, 312 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4922
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 11, 1970
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 34 A.D.2d 794 (South Shore Yacht Club v. State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
South Shore Yacht Club v. State Liquor Authority, 34 A.D.2d 794, 312 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to annul a determination of the respondent State Liquor Authority dated December 22, 1969, canceling petitioner’s club liquor license. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with $20 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the record establishes that petitioner permitted its license to be availed of by two corporate caterers for purposes of serving nonmembers during relatively lengthy periods of time. Although the activities of the caterers were clearly in violation of petitioner’s trust and confidence, this alone cannot excuse petitioner from its responsibility as a licensee. The activities of the caterers were not carried on in a clandestine manner hut were open and notorious and petitioner, through its officers, agents or employees, is chargeable both with the knowledge that these activities were being carried on and that they were in violation of the terms of the license. Petitioner apparently abdicated its responsibility and permitted its contractors to employ the license as they saw fit. Although the other five charges against petitioner might not be cause for cancellation in light of all the circumstances herein, we cannot say, even in view of petitioner’s prior unblemished record for law observance, that the charge of violation of section 111 of the Alcoholic Beverage [795]*795Control Law in the manner established by the uncontested facts herein did not warrant the measure and mode of discipline imposed (Matter of Stolz v. Board of Regents, 4 A D 2d 361). Christ, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Latham and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Alla Capital Dev. Corp. v. New York State Liq. Auth.
2018 NY Slip Op 2704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Happy Landing Lounge, Inc. v. State
219 A.D.2d 786 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Mendelsohn v. A & D Catering Corp.
119 Misc. 2d 581 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 A.D.2d 794, 312 N.Y.S.2d 146, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/south-shore-yacht-club-v-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1970.