South Shore Thrift Corp. v. National Bank
245 A.D. 754
Opinion
Order granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment and judgment entered thereon unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We are of opinion that not only does this complaint fail to allege a cause of action based on fraud, but that, in any event, reformation of the 'written contract with respect [755]*755to the question of notice was a prerequisite to recovery thereon. (Adams v. Gillig, 199 N. Y. 314, 318.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
South Shore Thrift Corp. v. National Bank, 245 A.D. 754 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
245 A.D. 754 (South Shore Thrift Corp. v. National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adams v. . Gillig
92 N.E. 670 (New York Court of Appeals, 1910)