South Shore Bank of Staten Island v. Wood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

South Shore Bank of Staten Island v. Wood

248 A.D. 828, 290 N.Y.S. 751, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7515

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 2, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the first and third defenses of defendant bank in an action upon a promissory note, and to reform the note and establish an equitable hen and mortgage, reversed on the law, in so far as appealed from, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the defenses as pleaded are insufficient to establish an equitable estoppel. (Rothschild v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co., 204 N. Y. 458.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the first and third defenses of defendant bank in an action upon a promissory note, and to reform the note and establish an equitable hen and mortgage, reversed on the law, in so far as appealed from, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the defenses as pleaded are insufficient to establish an equitable estoppel. (Rothschild v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co., 204 N. Y. 458.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

South Shore Bank of Staten Island v. Wood, 248 A.D. 828, 290 N.Y.S. 751, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7515 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 828 (South Shore Bank of Staten Island v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related