South San Joaquin Irrigation District v. Gillett

89 F.2d 1018, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3724
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 5, 1937
DocketNo. 8404
StatusPublished

This text of 89 F.2d 1018 (South San Joaquin Irrigation District v. Gillett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
South San Joaquin Irrigation District v. Gillett, 89 F.2d 1018, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3724 (9th Cir. 1937).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of motion of appel-lees to advance cause for hearing, etc., and oral presentation of motion by counsel for opposing parties, ordered motion granted, that a decree of affirmance be filed and entered accordingly, and the mandate of this court issue as provided in rule 32.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 F.2d 1018, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/south-san-joaquin-irrigation-district-v-gillett-ca9-1937.