South Puerto Rico Sugar Co. v. Tem-Cole, Inc.

370 So. 2d 1170, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14002
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 1979·No. No. 78-1308·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Before us is a motion to dismiss an appeal commenced by one co-defendant who seeks review of a final judgment exonerating another co-defendant from liability. On the authority of Christian et al. v. Popovich et al., 363 So.2d 2 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) and Sol Walker & Co. v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co., 362 So.2d 45 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978) the motion to dismiss is denied.

In so ruling we hold that the right of one co-defendant to appeal a judgment which exonerates another co-defendant is inherently implied in Florida’s Contribution Act, Florida Statutes (1977) § 768.31.

CROSS, LETTS and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

South Puerto Rico Sugar Co. v. Tem-Cole, Inc., 370 So. 2d 1170, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14002 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

370 So. 2d 1170 (South Puerto Rico Sugar Co. v. Tem-Cole, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

South Puerto Rico Sugar Co. v. Tem-Cole, Inc.
403 So. 2d 494 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Pensacola Interstate Fair, Inc. v. Popovich
389 So. 2d 1179 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)