South Palm Beach Investments, Inc. v. Regatta Trading Ltd.

789 So. 2d 396, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7162, 2001 WL 543249
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 23, 2001·No. No. 4D00-3958·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee brought a foreclosure action against the owner of the property in question. Appellants, who had previously conveyed all their rights and interests in the property to the owner, filed an emergency motion to intervene. The court denied the motion, and appellants filed this appeal. We hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying their motion. Appel-lee was seeking only to foreclose the mortgage, not a deficiency judgment. Having no rights nor interest in the property, appellants were not proper parties to this foreclosure suit. See Mitchell v. Fed. Nat’l Mortgage Ass’n, 763 So.2d 358, 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(citing Dennis v. Ivey, 134 Fla. 181, 185, 183 So. 624, 626 (1938)).

AFFIRMED.

POLEN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

South Palm Beach Investments, Inc. v. Regatta Trading Ltd., 789 So. 2d 396, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7162, 2001 WL 543249 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

789 So. 2d 396 (South Palm Beach Investments, Inc. v. Regatta Trading Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Viktoria Benkovitch v. U.S. Bank National Association, etc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Sudhoff v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
942 So. 2d 425 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Sudhoff v. FEDERAL NAT. MORTG. ASS'N
942 So. 2d 425 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)