South Pacific Co. v. Boyle

California Court of Appeal

South Pacific Co. v. Boyle

208 P. 981, 58 Cal. App. 785, 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 401

California Court of Appeal·Decided July 11, 1922·No. Civ. No. 4312.·Published

Opinion

[1] Let a peremptory writ issue as prayed on the authority ofOscar Heyman Brother (a Corporation v. Edwin C. Bath et al.,ante, p. 499 [208 P. 981].

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 7, 1922.

All the Justices present concurred.

Richards, J., pro tem., and Myers, J., pro tem., were acting. *Page 786

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1] Let a peremptory writ issue as prayed on the authority ofOscar Heyman Brother (a Corporation v. Edwin C. Bath et al.,ante, p. 499 [208 P. 981].

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 7, 1922.

All the Justices present concurred.

Richards, J., pro tem., and Myers, J., pro tem., were acting. *Page 786

South Pacific Co. v. Boyle, 208 P. 981, 58 Cal. App. 785, 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 401 (Cal. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

208 P. 981 (South Pacific Co. v. Boyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related