South & North Ala. Railroad v. Bradley

84 Ala. 468
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1887
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 84 Ala. 468 (South & North Ala. Railroad v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
South & North Ala. Railroad v. Bradley, 84 Ala. 468 (Ala. 1887).

Opinion

SOMEBTVTLLE, J.:

Tbe fees due tbe plaintiff, as compensation for official services performed by him, at tbe request of tbe defendant, being sucb as were authorized by law, constituted a debt, for which an action of debt, or indebitatus assumpsit would clearly lie. And tbe provisions of tbe statute, authorizing a judgment to be rendered in favor of tbe successful party for costs in civil actions (Code of 1886, § 2837), is no bar to tlie maintenance of such a suit. Hill v. White, 1 Ala. 576; Carville v. Reynolds, 9 Ala. 969; Tillman v. Wood, 58 Ala. 578; Dane v. Loomis, 51 Ala. 487: Bradley v. State, 69 Ala. 318.

Tbe judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Opinion of the Clerk
400 So. 2d 406 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1981)
Conlon v. Holste
110 N.W. 2 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1906)
Pilcher v. Hickman
41 So. 741 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1906)
Northern v. Hanners
121 Ala. 587 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 Ala. 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/south-north-ala-railroad-v-bradley-ala-1887.