South & North Ala. Railroad v. Bradley
This text of 84 Ala. 468 (South & North Ala. Railroad v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbe fees due tbe plaintiff, as compensation for official services performed by him, at tbe request of tbe defendant, being sucb as were authorized by law, constituted a debt, for which an action of debt, or indebitatus assumpsit would clearly lie. And tbe provisions of tbe statute, authorizing a judgment to be rendered in favor of tbe successful party for costs in civil actions (Code of 1886, § 2837), is no bar to tlie maintenance of such a suit. Hill v. White, 1 Ala. 576; Carville v. Reynolds, 9 Ala. 969; Tillman v. Wood, 58 Ala. 578; Dane v. Loomis, 51 Ala. 487: Bradley v. State, 69 Ala. 318.
Tbe judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 Ala. 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/south-north-ala-railroad-v-bradley-ala-1887.