South & North Ala. R. R. v. Bees

82 Ala. 340
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 82 Ala. 340 (South & North Ala. R. R. v. Bees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
South & North Ala. R. R. v. Bees, 82 Ala. 340 (Ala. 1886).

Opinion

STONE, C. J.

1. There is nothing in the objection urged, that the amendment, substituting the word mare for the word horse, made a new case, so as to let in the defense of non-presentation within six months. — Code of 1876, §§ 1711-14. Horse is a generic term, and includes mare. Bouv. Law Dict.; Lunsford v. State, 1 Tex. Ct. App. 448; Baldwin v. People, 1 Scam. 304; Wade v. Juda, 2 Car. & Payne, 351.

2. Nor need we consider any of the rulings on the question of the presentation of the claim within six, months after the injury was suffered. The suit was brought in less than six months, and that, of itself, was a written complaint preferred. — S. & N. Ala. R. R. Co. v. Morris, 65 Ala. 193; East Tenn., V. & G. R. R. Co. v. Bayliss, 74 Ala. 150. Rulings on this question, if erroneous, would be harmless.

3. When the plaintiff proved that his mare had been killed by the train of defendant, the burden was then cast on the railroad company of showing that it had employed that measure of diligence which the law exacts of railroad companies, and that the injury was not caused by its failure to, do so ; or, it must show that the injury could not have been averted by the employment of such diligence. Injury being proved, and no explanatory or exculpatory testimony being offered, the case is left with the burden unlifted, and the fault is imputed to the railioad company. — Ala. G. S. R. R. Co. v. McAlpine, 75 Ala. 113; East Tenn., V. & G. R. R. Co. v. Bayliss, 77 Ala. 429. The charges asked by appellant were properly refused.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sachra v. Town of Manilla
95 N.W. 198 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1903)
Birmingham Mineral R. R. v. Harris
98 Ala. 326 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1893)
Gadsden & Attalla Union Railway Co. v. Causler
97 Ala. 235 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1892)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Hawkins
92 Ala. 241 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Geo. Pacific Railway Co. v. Love
91 Ala. 432 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Geo. Pacific Railway Co. v. Davis
92 Ala. 300 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Henderson
89 Ala. 510 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1889)
Geo. Pacific Railway Co. v. Hughes
87 Ala. 610 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1888)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Jones
83 Ala. 376 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)
Georgia Pacific R. R. v. Blanton
84 Ala. 154 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 Ala. 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/south-north-ala-r-r-v-bees-ala-1886.