South Jersey Furniture Corp. v. Dorsey
99 N.J. Eq. 433
Opinion
The decree appeal from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll.
For ajfirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
South Jersey Furniture Corp. v. Dorsey, 99 N.J. Eq. 433 (N.J. 1926).
99 N.J. Eq. 433 (South Jersey Furniture Corp. v. Dorsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
K & J Clayton Holding Corp. v. Keuffel & Esser Co.
272 A.2d 565 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1971)
Matlack v. Arend
63 A.2d 812 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Levin v. Nedelman
55 A.2d 826 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Siesel v. Mandeville
55 A.2d 167 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Bondarchuk v. Barber
38 A.2d 872 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Miller v. Headley
158 A. 118 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1932)