South Fork Brewing Co. v. United States

Supreme Court

South Fork Brewing Co. v. United States

270 U.S. 631, 46 S. Ct. 349, 70 L. Ed. 770, 1926 U.S. LEXIS 453

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 15, 1926·No. No. 204·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Affirmed upon the authority, of [632]*632Washington Securities Co. v. United States, 234 U. S. 76, 78; Baker v. Schofield, 243 U. S. 114, 118; Southern Ry. Co. v, Puckett, 244 U. S. 571, 574; Piedmont & G. C. Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co., 254 U. S. 1, 13.

Mr. David V. Cahill, with whom Mr. Joseph A. Burdeau was on the brief, for appellants. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Mr. Arthur W. Henderson for the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Affirmed upon the authority, of [632]*632Washington Securities Co. v. United States, 234 U. S. 76, 78; Baker v. Schofield, 243 U. S. 114, 118; Southern Ry. Co. v, Puckett, 244 U. S. 571, 574; Piedmont & G. C. Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co., 254 U. S. 1, 13.

Mr. David V. Cahill, with whom Mr. Joseph A. Burdeau was on the brief, for appellants. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Mr. Arthur W. Henderson for the United States.

South Fork Brewing Co. v. United States, 270 U.S. 631, 46 S. Ct. 349, 70 L. Ed. 770, 1926 U.S. LEXIS 453 (1926).

Pincite

270 U.S. 631 (South Fork Brewing Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related