South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians
156 L. Ed. 2d 655, 123 S. Ct. 2638, 539 U.S. 957, 2003 U.S. LEXIS 5036, 71 U.S.L.W. 3798, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5644, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 7172
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians. Read the opinion of the Court — 541 U.S. 95 →
Opinion
C. A. 11th Cir. Motions of Pacific Legal Foundation, Lake Worth Drainage District et al., Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association et al., National Water Resources Association et al., and City of New York et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, 156 L. Ed. 2d 655, 123 S. Ct. 2638, 539 U.S. 957, 2003 U.S. LEXIS 5036, 71 U.S.L.W. 3798, 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5644, 2003 Daily Journal DAR 7172 (U.S. 2003).
156 L. Ed. 2d 655 (South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. South Florida Water Management District
280 F.3d 1364 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)