South Florida Public Telecommunication v. Salony

775 So. 2d 417, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 79, 2001 WL 9932
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 5, 2001·No. No. 1D00-265·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We do not reach the merits of this case because appellants’ arguments are not preserved for appeal. In order to preserve an argument for appeal, it must be presented to the judge of compensation claims “in substantially the same detail as the carrier would later wish to urge upon us.” Showell Farms v. Carter, 633 So.2d 477, 480 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

The order of the JCC is, therefore, AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, KAHN, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

South Florida Public Telecommunication v. Salony, 775 So. 2d 417, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 79, 2001 WL 9932 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

775 So. 2d 417 (South Florida Public Telecommunication v. Salony) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Showell Farms v. Carter
633 So. 2d 477 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)