South Florida Public Telecommunication v. Salony

775 So. 2d 417, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 79, 2001 WL 9932
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 5, 2001
DocketNo. 1D00-265
StatusPublished

This text of 775 So. 2d 417 (South Florida Public Telecommunication v. Salony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
South Florida Public Telecommunication v. Salony, 775 So. 2d 417, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 79, 2001 WL 9932 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We do not reach the merits of this case because appellants’ arguments are not preserved for appeal. In order to preserve an argument for appeal, it must be presented to the judge of compensation claims “in substantially the same detail as the carrier would later wish to urge upon us.” Showell Farms v. Carter, 633 So.2d 477, 480 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

The order of the JCC is, therefore, AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, KAHN, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Showell Farms v. Carter
633 So. 2d 477 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
775 So. 2d 417, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 79, 2001 WL 9932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/south-florida-public-telecommunication-v-salony-fladistctapp-2001.