South Florida Pain & Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. United Automobile Insurance Co.
This text of 82 So. 3d 854 (South Florida Pain & Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. United Automobile Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We treat the notice of appeal as a petition for a writ of certiorari. See Brass & Singer, P.A. v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 919 So.2d 473, 474 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (“Certiorari is the procedure for review in this court of the denial of appellate attorney’s fees by the appellate division of the circuit court.”). A writ of certiorari may be granted to review the circuit court sitting as an appellate court “only when there has been a violation of a clearly established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice.” Allstate Ins. Co. v. Kaklamanos, 843 So.2d 885, 889 (Fla.2003). The circuit court denied petitioner’s motion for attorney’s fees because petitioner requested fees in its brief and did not file a separate motion. The circuit court applied the correct law of this district. See McCreary v. Fla. Residential Prop. & Cas. Joint Underwriting Ass’n, 758 So.2d 692, 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). On the record before us, no miscarriage of justice has resulted. Therefore, we deny the petition.
Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 So. 3d 854, 2011 WL 1775816, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/south-florida-pain-rehabilitation-center-inc-v-united-automobile-fladistctapp-2011.