South Florida Hospital Corp. v. McCrea

112 So. 2d 393, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2934
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 28, 1959·No. No. 58-406·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff and her husband brought an action to recover damages for injuries sustained by her while a patient at the defendant institution. From judgments in favor of the plaintiffs, pursuant to jury verdicts, the defendant appealed.

The defendant contends that the lower court erred in applying-the doctrine of res [394]*394ipsa loquitur because the plaintiffs introduced evidence of specific negligence on the part of the defendant. West Coast Hospital Ass’n v. Webb, Fla., 52 So.2d 803; Roth v. Dade County, Fla., 71 So.2d 169. That this jurisdiction has not aligned itself with those jurisdictions so holding (33 A.L. R.2d 800) is evident from the decision in McKinney Supply Company v. Orovitz, Fla., 96 So.2d 209; 33 A.L.R.2d 795.

Defendant’s second point has been carefully examined and found to be without merit.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., HORTON, J., and WARREN, LAMAR, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

South Florida Hospital Corp. v. McCrea, 112 So. 2d 393, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2934 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

112 So. 2d 393 (South Florida Hospital Corp. v. McCrea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dayton Tire and Rubber Co. v. Davis
348 So. 2d 575 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Southern Florida Sanitarium & Hospital, Inc. v. Hodge
215 So. 2d 753 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Kulczynski v. Harrington ex rel. Harrington
207 So. 2d 505 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)