South Dakota v. Bourland

13 F.3d 264

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 22, 1993·No. Nos. 90-5486, 90-5515·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The petition for rehearing by the panel is granted. The suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

South Dakota v. Bourland, 13 F.3d 264 (8th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

13 F.3d 264 (South Dakota v. Bourland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

South Dakota v. Bourland

39 F.3d 868 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)

State of South Dakota, in Its Own Behalf, and as Parens Patriae v. Gregg Bourland, Personally and as Chairman of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Dennis Rousseau, Personally and as Director of Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Game, Fish and Parks, United States of America the States of Montana, Alabama, California, Colorado, Minnesota, North Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming, Amicus Curiae. State of South Dakota, in Its Own Behalf, and as Parens Patriae v. Gregg Bourland, Personally and as Chairman of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Dennis Rousseau, Personally and as Director of Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Game, Fish and Parks, United States of America the States of Montana, Alabama, California, Colorado, Minnesota, North Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming, Amicus Curiae

39 F.3d 868 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)

State of South Dakota, Etc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Gregg Bourland, Appellants/cross-Appellees

13 F.3d 264 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)