South Dakota Migratory Bird Ass'n Ex Rel. Brancel v. South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks Commission

312 N.W.2d 374, 1981 S.D. LEXIS 363
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 18, 1981
Docket13413
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 312 N.W.2d 374 (South Dakota Migratory Bird Ass'n Ex Rel. Brancel v. South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
South Dakota Migratory Bird Ass'n Ex Rel. Brancel v. South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks Commission, 312 N.W.2d 374, 1981 S.D. LEXIS 363 (S.D. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks Commission (Commission) promulgated a “steel shot rule” (Administrative Rule 41:06:04:05(4)). This rule in effect bans the use of lead shotgun pellets in certain geographical areas where the Commission concluded lead pellets would present a health hazard to migratory waterfowl.

The circuit court issued a declaratory judgment determining that the “steel shot rule” was properly enacted by the Commission.

This appeal addresses the narrow issue of whether there was a proper delegation to the Commission of rule-making authority to enable the Commission to adopt a “steel shot rule.”

In order to find a proper delegation there must be:

1. A clearly expressed legislative will to delegate the power to adopt the particular rule; and,
2. A sufficient guide or standard to guide the agency.

Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict v. Janklow, 308 N.W.2d 559 (S.D.1981); Bjornson v. City of Aberdeen, 296 N.W.2d 896 (S.D.1980); State, Div. of Human Rights v. Prudential Ins., 273 N.W.2d 111 (S.D.1978); Application of Kohlman, 263 N.W.2d 674 (S.D.1978); Boe v. Foss, 76 S.D. 295, 77 N.W.2d 1 (1956). Cf. Affiliated Distillers Brands Corp. v. Gillis, 81 S.D. 44, 130 N.W.2d 597 (1964).

The prerequisites must be found, if they exist, in SDCL 41-2-18 and SDCL 41-2-32 which provide:

41-2-18. The department of game, fish and parks shall have the power to regulate, direct, and control in every practical manner under the laws of this state, the conservation, protection, importation, and propagation, and the hunting, taking, or killing of all game and fur-bearing animals, game birds, and fish and harmless birds and animals and, except as otherwise provided by statute, shall have jurisdiction and authority for such purposes over all lands and waters owned, leased, or controlled by the state ....
41-2-32. The game, fish and parks commission shall have the power to make rules and regulations for the purpose of *376 carrying out the purpose and intent of the laws pertaining to matters under their jurisdiction, which rules and regulations must be consistent with said purposes and intent. . . .

We believe that SDCL 41-2-32 is the clearly expressed legislative will to delegate the power to adopt the particular rule.

Furthermore, we believe that SDCL 41-2-18, which describes the purpose of the Department of Game, Fish and Parks which must act through its Commission, provides the sufficient guide or standard to guide the agency.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

HEEGE, Circuit Judge, sitting for DUNN, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Moschell
2004 SD 35 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2004)
Boever v. South Dakota Board of Accountancy
1997 SD 34 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1997)
Boever v. SD Bd. of Accountancy
1997 SD 34 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1997)
First National Bank of Minneapolis v. Kehn Ranch, Inc.
394 N.W.2d 709 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1986)
Application of Southern Hills Bank of Edgemont
339 N.W.2d 310 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1983)
Matter of Ackerson, Karlen & Schmitt
335 N.W.2d 342 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1983)
Application of Northwestern Bell Tel. Co.
326 N.W.2d 100 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
312 N.W.2d 374, 1981 S.D. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/south-dakota-migratory-bird-assn-ex-rel-brancel-v-south-dakota-game-sd-1981.