Home/Supreme Court/South Dakota ex rel. Richards v. Whisman

South Dakota ex rel. Richards v. Whisman

241 U.S. 643, 36 S. Ct. 449
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 6, 1916·No. No. 819·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471-472; (2) Luther v. Borden, 7 How. 1; Taylor v. Beckham, 178 U. S. 548; [644] Pacific States Telegraph &c. Co. v. Oregon, 223 U. S. 118; O’Neill v. Leamer, 239 U. S. 244, 248.

Mr. Webster Ballinger and Mr. T. H. Null for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Clarence C. Caldwell and Mr. Samuel Herrick for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

South Dakota ex rel. Richards v. Whisman, 241 U.S. 643, 36 S. Ct. 449 (1916).

241 U.S. 643 (South Dakota ex rel. Richards v. Whisman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Luther v. Borden
48 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1849)
Taylor and Marshall v. Beckham
178 U.S. 548 (Supreme Court, 1900)
Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Oregon
223 U.S. 118 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.
226 U.S. 102 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Parker v. McLain
237 U.S. 469 (Supreme Court, 1915)
O'NEILL v. Leamer
239 U.S. 244 (Supreme Court, 1915)