Home/Supreme Court/South Dakota ex rel. Richards v. Whisman

South Dakota ex rel. Richards v. Whisman

241 U.S. 643, 36 S. Ct. 449
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 6, 1916
DocketNo. 819
StatusPublished

This text of 241 U.S. 643 (South Dakota ex rel. Richards v. Whisman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
South Dakota ex rel. Richards v. Whisman, 241 U.S. 643, 36 S. Ct. 449 (1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471-472; (2) Luther v. Borden, 7 How. 1; Taylor v. Beckham, 178 U. S. 548; [644]*644Pacific States Telegraph &c. Co. v. Oregon, 223 U. S. 118; O’Neill v. Leamer, 239 U. S. 244, 248.

Mr. Webster Ballinger and Mr. T. H. Null for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Clarence C. Caldwell and Mr. Samuel Herrick for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Luther v. Borden
48 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1849)
Taylor and Marshall v. Beckham
178 U.S. 548 (Supreme Court, 1900)
Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Oregon
223 U.S. 118 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.
226 U.S. 102 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Parker v. McLain
237 U.S. 469 (Supreme Court, 1915)
O'NEILL v. Leamer
239 U.S. 244 (Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 U.S. 643, 36 S. Ct. 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/south-dakota-ex-rel-richards-v-whisman-scotus-1916.