Home/Fifth Circuit/South Central Bell Telephone Company v. Constant, Inc., and the Succession of John D. Constant, Sr., No. 30759 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

South Central Bell Telephone Company v. Constant, Inc., and the Succession of John D. Constant, Sr., No. 30759 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

437 F.2d 1207
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 19, 1971
Docket1207
StatusPublished

This text of 437 F.2d 1207 (South Central Bell Telephone Company v. Constant, Inc., and the Succession of John D. Constant, Sr., No. 30759 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
South Central Bell Telephone Company v. Constant, Inc., and the Succession of John D. Constant, Sr., No. 30759 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I, 437 F.2d 1207 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

437 F.2d 1207

SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CONSTANT, INC., and the Succession of John D. Constant, Sr.,
Defendants-Appellants.
No. 30759 Summary Calendar.*
* Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970,
431 F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 8, 1971. Rehearing Denied March 19, 1971.

Clint L. Pierson, Baton Rouge, La., for defendants-appellants.

Victor A. Sachse, Fernando J. Freyre, Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana, E. Gordon West, Judge, 304 F.Supp. 732.

Before WISDOM, COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1

1

See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5th Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

National Labor Relations Board v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 990
430 F.2d 966 (Fifth Circuit, 1970)
Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, Defendant-Third Party v. Marine Mart, Inc., Third Party
431 F.2d 409 (Third Circuit, 1970)
South Central Bell Telephone Company v. Constant, Inc.
304 F. Supp. 732 (E.D. Louisiana, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
437 F.2d 1207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/south-central-bell-telephone-company-v-constant-inc-and-the-succession-ca5-1971.