South Central Bell Telephone Company v. Constant, Inc., and the Succession of John D. Constant, Sr.
This text of 437 F.2d 1207 (South Central Bell Telephone Company v. Constant, Inc., and the Succession of John D. Constant, Sr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
437 F.2d 1207
SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CONSTANT, INC., and the Succession of John D. Constant, Sr., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 30759. Summary Calendar.*
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
February 8, 1971.
Rehearing Denied March 19, 1971.
Appeal from the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana, E. Gordon West, Judge, 304 F.Supp. 732.
Clint L. Pierson, Baton Rouge, La., for defendants-appellants.
Victor A. Sachse, Fernando J. Freyre, Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, Baton Rouge, La., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before WISDOM, COLEMAN, and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1
Notes:
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5th Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
437 F.2d 1207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/south-central-bell-telephone-company-v-constant-in-ca5-1971.