South Carolina State Highway Department v. Isthmian S. S. Co.

43 S.E.2d 138, 210 S.C. 422, 1947 S.C. LEXIS 44
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 6, 1947·No. 15956·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment upon the appeal of The South Carolina State Highway Department, plaintiff in this action, against Isthmian Steamship Company, defendant, and respondent in that appeal but appellant here, was filed this day. 43 S. E. (2d) 132. It holds that the Company waived its objections to the jurisdiction of the Court of Common Pleas for Charleston County. That court finally overruled such objections and the Company, defendant below, excepted and seeks review of that action in this appeal. But whether there was error has become a moot question by reason of the result of the prior appeal. Under these circumstances the appeal is dismissed. 3 Am. Jur. 308 et seq., Appeal and Error, Sec. 733; 4 C. J. S., Appeal and Error, Sec. 1362, p. 1967 et seq.) Wallingford & Russell v. Benson, 17 S. C. 591; Cantwell v. Williams, 35 S. C. 602,44 S. E.. 549; Burgess v. Crumpton, 93 S. C. 562, 77 S. E. 356; Page v. Page, 167 N. C. 350, 83 S. E. 627.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

South Carolina State Highway Department v. Isthmian S. S. Co., 43 S.E.2d 138, 210 S.C. 422, 1947 S.C. LEXIS 44 (S.C. 1947).

43 S.E.2d 138 (South Carolina State Highway Department v. Isthmian S. S. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Page v. . Page
83 S.E. 627 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)
South Carolina State Highway Department v. Isthmian S.S. Co.
43 S.E.2d 132 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1947)
Burgess v. Crumpton
77 S.E. 356 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1913)
Page v. Page
167 N.C. 350 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)