South Camden Trust Co. v. Stiefel
144 A. 798, 104 N.J. Eq. 206, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 509
Opinion
The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 41.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, ■ Kalisch, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Bus-kirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
South Camden Trust Co. v. Stiefel, 144 A. 798, 104 N.J. Eq. 206, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 509 (N.J. 1929).
144 A. 798 (South Camden Trust Co. v. Stiefel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. Royal Battery Corp.
25 A.2d 203 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)