South Bend Bait Co. v. Redman

159 So. 21, 118 Fla. 257, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1696
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 24, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 159 So. 21 (South Bend Bait Co. v. Redman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
South Bend Bait Co. v. Redman, 159 So. 21, 118 Fla. 257, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1696 (Fla. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Whit-

field, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Davis are of the opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be reversed, while Mr. Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the said decree *258 should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 So. 21, 118 Fla. 257, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/south-bend-bait-co-v-redman-fla-1935.