South Bend Bait Co. v. Redman

159 So. 21, 118 Fla. 257, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1696
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 24, 1935·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Whit-

field, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Davis are of the opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be reversed, while Mr. Justice Ellis, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the said decree *258 should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

South Bend Bait Co. v. Redman, 159 So. 21, 118 Fla. 257, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1696 (Fla. 1935).

159 So. 21 (South Bend Bait Co. v. Redman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)