South Bay United Pentecostal v. Gavin Newsom

983 F.3d 383
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in South Bay United Pentecostal v. Gavin Newsom. Read the opinion of the Court — 985 F.3d 1128
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 24, 2020·No. 20-56358·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SOUTH BAY UNITED PENTECOSTAL No. 20-56358 CHURCH, a California nonprofit corporation; BISHOP ARTHUR HODGES D.C. No. III, an individual, 3:20-cv-00865-BAS-AHG Southern District of California, Plaintiffs-Appellants, San Diego

v. ORDER

GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as the Governor of California; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Before: WARDLAW and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and HILLMAN,* District Judge.

Appellants’ Urgent Motion for an Injunction Pending Appeal Under Circuit

Rule 27-3(b) (ECF No. 5) is DENIED without prejudice to renewing the request

for injunctive relief in conjunction with the merits appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

* The Honorable Timothy Hillman, United States District Judge for the District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

South Bay United Pentecostal v. Gavin Newsom, 983 F.3d 383 (9th Cir. 2020).

983 F.3d 383 (South Bay United Pentecostal v. Gavin Newsom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.