South Bay Club Condominium Ass'n v. Dublino

766 So. 2d 1083, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9024, 2000 WL 986414
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 19, 2000·No. No. 3D99-2569·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the record before us, we affirm the summary judgment entered below in favor of appellees, George Toledo, George Cris-pin and Melissa Sabino, as well as the order dismissing appellees, Anthony and Jennifer Dublino’s complaint with prejudice on the ground of mootness. On the cross-appeal filed by Toledo, Crispin and Sabino, we reverse the order denying them an award of attorney’s fees as we conclude that they were entitled to fees under both section 718.303(1), Florida Statutes (1995) and appellant South Bay’s Condominium Association, Inc.’s Declaration 19.3 1, and remand this cause for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Affirmed in part. Reversed and remanded in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

South Bay Club Condominium Ass'n v. Dublino, 766 So. 2d 1083, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9024, 2000 WL 986414 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

766 So. 2d 1083 (South Bay Club Condominium Ass'n v. Dublino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. State
766 So. 2d 1083 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)