South 51 Development Corp. v. Vega

809 N.E.2d 122, 211 Ill. 2d 189, 283 Ill. Dec. 929, 2004 Ill. LEXIS 1014
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 2004
DocketNos. 95401, 95651 cons.
StatusPublished

This text of 809 N.E.2d 122 (South 51 Development Corp. v. Vega) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
South 51 Development Corp. v. Vega, 809 N.E.2d 122, 211 Ill. 2d 189, 283 Ill. Dec. 929, 2004 Ill. LEXIS 1014 (Ill. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this case, one Justice of this Court has recused herself and the remaining members of the Court are divided so that it is not possible to secure the constitutionally required concurrence of four judges for a decision (see Ill. Const. 1970, art. VI, § 3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The effect of this dismissal is the same as an affirmance by an equally divided court of the decision under review but is of no precedential value. See Perlman v. First National Bank, 60 Ill. 2d 529, 530 (1975).

McMORROW, C.J., took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perlman v. First Nat'l Bank of Chicago
331 N.E.2d 65 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
809 N.E.2d 122, 211 Ill. 2d 189, 283 Ill. Dec. 929, 2004 Ill. LEXIS 1014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/south-51-development-corp-v-vega-ill-2004.