South 51 Development Corp. v. Vega

809 N.E.2d 122, 211 Ill. 2d 189, 283 Ill. Dec. 929, 2004 Ill. LEXIS 1014
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 2004·No. Nos. 95401, 95651 cons.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this case, one Justice of this Court has recused herself and the remaining members of the Court are divided so that it is not possible to secure the constitutionally required concurrence of four judges for a decision (see Ill. Const. 1970, art. VI, § 3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The effect of this dismissal is the same as an affirmance by an equally divided court of the decision under review but is of no precedential value. See Perlman v. First National Bank, 60 Ill. 2d 529, 530 (1975).

McMORROW, C.J., took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

South 51 Development Corp. v. Vega, 809 N.E.2d 122, 211 Ill. 2d 189, 283 Ill. Dec. 929, 2004 Ill. LEXIS 1014 (Ill. 2004).

809 N.E.2d 122 (South 51 Development Corp. v. Vega) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perlman v. First Nat'l Bank of Chicago
331 N.E.2d 65 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1975)