Souter v. . Davenport

15 N.C. 600
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1834
StatusPublished

This text of 15 N.C. 600 (Souter v. . Davenport) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Souter v. . Davenport, 15 N.C. 600 (N.C. 1834).

Opinion

Gaston, Judge

After stating the facts as above, proceeded:- — The cause has been here submitted without argument, and the only error assigned by the appellant is clearly not sustainable. After verdict, it appears that defendant’s counsel moved in arrest of judgment upon the ground that the warrant which was the plaintiff’s declaration, and the bond offered in evidence, did Dot correspond; which motion was overruled by the court. Had there been a variance, which we by no means admit, the objection should have been taken on the trial. A motion in arrest can only be founded on some intrinsic cause appearing upon the face of the record.

The judgment is to be affirmed with costs.

Per Curiam. — Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 N.C. 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/souter-v-davenport-nc-1834.