Souter v. County of Warren
This text of 594 F. App'x 139 (Souter v. County of Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Julia E. Souter appeals the district court’s order denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion seeking relief from the district court’s orders dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action and denying her motion to amend the court’s judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Souter v. Cnty. of Warren, No. 5:13-cv-00061-MFU-JGW (WD.Va. Aug. 28, 2014). We deny Souter’s motion to appoint counsel, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
594 F. App'x 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/souter-v-county-of-warren-ca4-2015.