Source Vagabond Systems Ltd. v. Hydrapak, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Source Vagabond Systems Ltd. v. Hydrapak, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJanuary 11, 2013

Docket12-1408

StatusUnpublished

This text of Source Vagabond Systems Ltd. v. Hydrapak, Inc. (Source Vagabond Systems Ltd. v. Hydrapak, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Source Vagabond Systems Ltd. v. Hydrapak, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SOURCE VAGABOND SYSTEMS LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

HYDRAPAK, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2012-1408 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (New York City) in No. 11- CV-5379, Judge Colleen McMahon. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

GUY YONAY, Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

ERIC S. WALTERS, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was BENJAMIN J. BYER. ______________________ THIS CAUSE HAVING BEEN HEARD AND CONSIDERED, IT IS

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, BRYSON, AND O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 11, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI