Sourbeer, G. v. Reinaker, D.
This text of Sourbeer, G. v. Reinaker, D. (Sourbeer, G. v. Reinaker, D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
GREGORY SCOTT SOURBEER, : No. 143 MM 2016 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : DENNIS E. REINAKER, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus
is DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (providing that
hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the
filing to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sourbeer, G. v. Reinaker, D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sourbeer-g-v-reinaker-d-pa-2016.