Sourbeer, G. v. Reinaker, D.

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 29, 2016
Docket143 MM 2016
StatusPublished

This text of Sourbeer, G. v. Reinaker, D. (Sourbeer, G. v. Reinaker, D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sourbeer, G. v. Reinaker, D., (Pa. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

GREGORY SCOTT SOURBEER, : No. 143 MM 2016 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : DENNIS E. REINAKER, : : Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus

is DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (providing that

hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the

filing to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sourbeer, G. v. Reinaker, D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sourbeer-g-v-reinaker-d-pa-2016.