Sourbeer, G. v. Reinaker, D.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
GREGORY SCOTT SOURBEER, : No. 143 MM 2016 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : DENNIS E. REINAKER, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus
is DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (providing that
hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the
filing to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sourbeer, G. v. Reinaker, D., (Pa. 2016).
Sourbeer, G. v. Reinaker, D. (Sourbeer, G. v. Reinaker, D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)