Soule v. Lozada

240 A.D.2d 897, 658 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6718
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 19, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

White, J.

Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court (Tait, Jr., J.), entered April 4, 1996 in Madison County, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment, and (2) from a letter of said court, entered July 26, 1996 in Madison County, which dismissed defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment.

Defendant’s appeal from Supreme Court’s order granting plaintiffs a default judgment is dismissed since a party may not appeal directly from an order entered upon his or her [898] default, the proper remedy being a motion to vacate the default and an appeal from any denial thereof (see, Matter of Campbell v Records Access Officer, 221 AD2d 201; Brannigan v Dubuque, 199 AD2d 851).

We shall also dismiss the purported appeal from Supreme Court’s letter, dated June 17, 1996, because that document is not an appealable paper (see, Prince v Inverary, 235 AD2d 467). In any event, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to consider defendant’s motion since the motion papers were not in proper form.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Soule v. Lozada, 240 A.D.2d 897, 658 N.Y.S.2d 746, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6718 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

240 A.D.2d 897 (Soule v. Lozada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Settembrini v. Settembrini
270 A.D.2d 408 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Gennett v. Gennett
245 A.D.2d 598 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)