Soule v. FOREST LAKE CLINIC

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Soule v. FOREST LAKE CLINIC

633 N.W.2d 852, 2001 Minn. LEXIS 700, 2001 WL 1168265

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided September 27, 2001·No. C1-01-1155·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed June 11, 2001, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 136.01, subd. 1(b).

Employee is awarded $600 in attorney ■fees.

BY THE COURT:

Joan Ericksen Lancaster Joan Ericksen Lancaster Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed June 11, 2001, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 136.01, subd. 1(b).

Employee is awarded $600 in attorney ■fees.

BY THE COURT:

Joan Ericksen Lancaster Joan Ericksen Lancaster Associate Justice

Soule v. FOREST LAKE CLINIC, 633 N.W.2d 852, 2001 Minn. LEXIS 700, 2001 WL 1168265 (Mich. 2001).

Pincite

633 N.W.2d 852 (Soule v. FOREST LAKE CLINIC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related