Soule v. Dawes
6 Cal. 473
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Soule v. Dawes. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 Cal. 247 →
Opinion
Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.
The witness, Howard, being responsible to the plaintiffs as endorser of the note sued on, had a direct interest in establishing a lien upon the property of the defendants; he was therefore an incompetent witness for that purpose.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Soule v. Dawes, 6 Cal. 473 (Cal. 1856).
6 Cal. 473 (Soule v. Dawes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.