Soufeh v. Reliance Insurance

162 A.D.2d 308, 556 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7460
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 21, 1990·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. Greenfield, J.), entered May 5, 1989, which granted defendant’s summary judgment motion and dismissed plain[309]*309tiffs cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

After plaintiff consigned certain precious stones to another jeweler, the stones were stolen from that jeweler’s unattended car. Plaintiff’s subsequent insurance claim was denied by his insurer because the loss did not occur on the premises specified in the policy, or in possession of certain types of employees or agents in transit. Moreover, an exclusionary provision served to void coverage where the loss claimed resulted from property being left in an unattended vehicle. Accordingly, we find that plaintiffs insurance claims were outside the scope of his policy. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Soufeh v. Reliance Insurance, 162 A.D.2d 308, 556 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7460 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

162 A.D.2d 308 (Soufeh v. Reliance Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Avi & Co. N.Y.Corp v. Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Policy No.FINFR1902879
2026 NY Slip Op 00186 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026)
Tivoli Corp. v. Jewelers Mutual Insurance Co.
932 S.W.2d 704 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)