Souer v. De Bary

105 F. 293, 58 L.R.A. 900, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 3829
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 11, 1900
DocketNo. 966
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 105 F. 293 (Souer v. De Bary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Souer v. De Bary, 105 F. 293, 58 L.R.A. 900, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 3829 (5th Cir. 1900).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is now before this court for the second time. The opinion of this court on the first writ of error contains a full statement of the case. De Bary v. Souer, 41 C. C. A. 417, 101 Fed. 425. The case is now here on the same facts. No new material question is raised. It is well settled that questions once considered and decided by an appellate court will not be re-exainined on a subsequent appeal or writ of error in the same case. Railway Co. v. Wilder, 41 C. C. A. 305, 101 Fed. 198; Supervisors v. Kennicott, 94 U. S. 498, 24 L. Ed. 260. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Application of Filippini
202 P.2d 535 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1949)
Wirtz v. Nestos
200 N.W. 524 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1924)
Cogswell v. Drennen
271 F. 289 (Fifth Circuit, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 F. 293, 58 L.R.A. 900, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 3829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/souer-v-de-bary-ca5-1900.