Souer v. De Bary

Fifth Circuit

Souer v. De Bary

105 F. 293, 58 L.R.A. 900, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 3829

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 11, 1900·No. No. 966·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is now before this court for the second time. The opinion of this court on the first writ of error contains a full statement of the case. De Bary v. Souer, 41 C. C. A. 417, 101 Fed. 425. The case is now here on the same facts. No new material question is raised. It is well settled that questions once considered and decided by an appellate court will not be re-exainined on a subsequent appeal or writ of error in the same case. Railway Co. v. Wilder, 41 C. C. A. 305, 101 Fed. 198; Supervisors v. Kennicott, 94 U. S. 498, 24 L. Ed. 260. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case is now before this court for the second time. The opinion of this court on the first writ of error contains a full statement of the case. De Bary v. Souer, 41 C. C. A. 417, 101 Fed. 425. The case is now here on the same facts. No new material question is raised. It is well settled that questions once considered and decided by an appellate court will not be re-exainined on a subsequent appeal or writ of error in the same case. Railway Co. v. Wilder, 41 C. C. A. 305, 101 Fed. 198; Supervisors v. Kennicott, 94 U. S. 498, 24 L. Ed. 260. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Souer v. De Bary, 105 F. 293, 58 L.R.A. 900, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 3829 (5th Cir. 1900).

Pincite

105 F. 293 (Souer v. De Bary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related