Soueidan v. Case Street Condominium, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Soueidan v. Case Street Condominium, Inc.

267 A.D.2d 449, 700 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13379

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 27, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 267 A.D.2d 449 (Soueidan v. Case Street Condominium, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Soueidan v. Case Street Condominium, Inc., 267 A.D.2d 449, 700 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13379 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Case Street Condominium, Inc., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated September 9, 1998, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied his cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability against the defendant Case Street Condominium, Inc.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

There are triable issues of fact which require the denial of summary judgment. S. Miller, J. P., O’Brien, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Case Street Condominium, Inc., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated September 9, 1998, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied his cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability against the defendant Case Street Condominium, Inc.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

There are triable issues of fact which require the denial of summary judgment. S. Miller, J. P., O’Brien, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 449, 700 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soueidan-v-case-street-condominium-inc-nyappdiv-1999.