Souders, James Garry Iii
This text of Souders, James Garry Iii (Souders, James Garry Iii) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-92,431-01
EX PARTE JAMES GARRY SOUDERS III, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 10020A IN THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT FROM LAMPASAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of evading arrest and sentenced to imprisonment. Applicant filed
this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk
forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that the Board of Pardons and Paroles denied him procedural due process
in reviewing him for parole release. There is no response in the habeas record from the Parole Board.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. See Swarthout v. Cooke, 131 S.Ct.
859 (2011). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum
for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order the Board
of Pardons and Paroles’s Office of the General Counsel to obtain a response from a person with 2
knowledge of relevant facts. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in
Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant
is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall
appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel
is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant
was denied procedural due process in his parole review. The trial court may make any other findings
and conclusions that it deems appropriate.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: March 31, 2021
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Souders, James Garry Iii, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/souders-james-garry-iii-texcrimapp-2021.