Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Souden v. Victor Preserving Co.

Souden v. Victor Preserving Co.

253 A.D. 848, 1 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8886
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 12, 1938
StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D. 848 (Souden v. Victor Preserving Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Souden v. Victor Preserving Co., 253 A.D. 848, 1 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, without prejudice to an application to reinstate the same if the proposed settlement is not approved by the State Industrial Board, without costs. The court finds no authority for the refusal of the State Industrial Board to entertain the application for ratification of the proposed settlement. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 A.D. 848, 1 N.Y.S.2d 671, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/souden-v-victor-preserving-co-nyappdiv-1938.