Souberman v. Zurbrick

Sixth Circuit

Souberman v. Zurbrick

89 F.2d 1019, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3725

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMay 11, 1937

DocketNo. 7718

StatusPublished

This text of 89 F.2d 1019 (Souberman v. Zurbrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Souberman v. Zurbrick, 89 F.2d 1019, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3725 (6th Cir. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the court that a motion to docket and dismiss appeal has been filed, accompanied by certificate of the clerk of the District Court as provided by rule 18, and it further appearing that appellant has failed to file the record or docket the case by or before the return day, and that there has been no extension of time therefor, on consideration whereof, it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is hereby, docketed and dismissed, the costs to be charged against the government as constructive earnings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the court that a motion to docket and dismiss appeal has been filed, accompanied by certificate of the clerk of the District Court as provided by rule 18, and it further appearing that appellant has failed to file the record or docket the case by or before the return day, and that there has been no extension of time therefor, on consideration whereof, it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is hereby, docketed and dismissed, the costs to be charged against the government as constructive earnings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 F.2d 1019, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/souberman-v-zurbrick-ca6-1937.