Sotomayor v. Yarmouth Lumber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sotomayor v. Yarmouth Lumber

60 A.D.3d 840, 874 N.Y.S.2d 379

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.3d 840 (Sotomayor v. Yarmouth Lumber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sotomayor v. Yarmouth Lumber, 60 A.D.3d 840, 874 N.Y.S.2d 379 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the [841]*841Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated May 14, 2008, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants established, prima facie, their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin and Belen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the [841]*841Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated May 14, 2008, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants established, prima facie, their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin and Belen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.3d 840, 874 N.Y.S.2d 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sotomayor-v-yarmouth-lumber-nyappdiv-2009.