Sotomayor v. Batmasian

230 So. 3d 42
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 15, 2017·No. No. 4D17-2344·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We reverse the trial court’s order imposing attorney’s fees as a sanction.1 The court sanctioned appellant based on her attorney’s violation of a court order. The sanction order fails to comply with the requirements of Moakley v. Smallwood, 826 So.2d 221 (Fla. 2002). In addition, there was insufficient evidence to support the amount of fees imposed by the court. See Tutor Time Merger Corp. v. MeCabe, 763 So.2d 505 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Reversed.

Ciklin, Conner and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sotomayor v. Batmasian, 230 So. 3d 42 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

230 So. 3d 42 (Sotomayor v. Batmasian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ruppel v. Gulf Winds Apartments, Inc.
508 So. 2d 534 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Moakley v. Smallwood
826 So. 2d 221 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Tutor Time Merger Corp. v. MeCabe
763 So. 2d 505 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)