Sotomayor v. Batmasian
This text of 230 So. 3d 42 (Sotomayor v. Batmasian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s order imposing attorney’s fees as a sanction.1 The court sanctioned appellant based on her attorney’s violation of a court order. The sanction order fails to comply with the requirements of Moakley v. Smallwood, 826 So.2d 221 (Fla. 2002). In addition, there was insufficient evidence to support the amount of fees imposed by the court. See Tutor Time Merger Corp. v. MeCabe, 763 So.2d 505 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 So. 3d 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sotomayor-v-batmasian-fladistctapp-2017.