Soto v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Soto v. State

199 S.W.2d 506, 150 Tex. Crim. 172, 1947 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 845

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 12, 1947

DocketNo. 23576.

StatusPublished

This text of 199 S.W.2d 506 (Soto v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Soto v. State, 199 S.W.2d 506, 150 Tex. Crim. 172, 1947 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 845 (Tex. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for murder; the punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

The sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction is the sole question before us.

The State’s testimony is deemed sufficient to show that:

On the night of July 14, 1946, deceased and his brother were drinking beer in a dance-hall. Deceased and one Sanchez got into a fight. The fight was stopped — after which, deceased, his brother, and Sanchez went outside the dancehall and the fight was resumed. The fight was stopped and deceased and his brother were preparing to leave in a truck, when appellant and his brother — friends of Sanchez — entered into the difficulty by attacking deceased and his brother. During this attack, deceased received a knife-stab wound in the region of the heart, from which he died shortly thereafter. The brother of deceased was knocked unconscious.

An eyewitness to the difficulty testified to seeing a knife in in the hands of appellant immediately after the fatal difficulty. There is no suggestion in the testimony that any others participated in that difficulty.

The case was submitted to the jury under the law of principals, upon the theory of a joint attack by appellant and his brother.

*173 The facts are deemed sufficient to warrant the jury’s conclusion of guilt.

The judgment of the trial is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for murder; the punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

The sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction is the sole question before us.

The State’s testimony is deemed sufficient to show that:

On the night of July 14, 1946, deceased and his brother were drinking beer in a dance-hall. Deceased and one Sanchez got into a fight. The fight was stopped — after which, deceased, his brother, and Sanchez went outside the dancehall and the fight was resumed. The fight was stopped and deceased and his brother were preparing to leave in a truck, when appellant and his brother — friends of Sanchez — entered into the difficulty by attacking deceased and his brother. During this attack, deceased received a knife-stab wound in the region of the heart, from which he died shortly thereafter. The brother of deceased was knocked unconscious.

An eyewitness to the difficulty testified to seeing a knife in in the hands of appellant immediately after the fatal difficulty. There is no suggestion in the testimony that any others participated in that difficulty.

The case was submitted to the jury under the law of principals, upon the theory of a joint attack by appellant and his brother.

*173 The facts are deemed sufficient to warrant the jury’s conclusion of guilt.

The judgment of the trial is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 S.W.2d 506, 150 Tex. Crim. 172, 1947 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/soto-v-state-texcrimapp-1947.