Soto v. State

851 So. 2d 308, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12332, 2003 WL 21919259
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Soto v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 874 So. 2d 1215
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 13, 2003·No. No. 3D00-677·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Vidal Soto appeals the sentence imposed after a jury verdict of guilt on the offenses of armed burglary and armed robbery. The State concedes that defendant-appellant Soto is within the window period for purposes of Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), see Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924 (Fla.2000), and that he is entitled to be resentenced.

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Soto v. State, 851 So. 2d 308, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12332, 2003 WL 21919259 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

851 So. 2d 308 (Soto v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trapp v. State
760 So. 2d 924 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)