Soto v. Scala

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Soto v. Scala

49 A.D.2d 721, 374 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10654

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 25, 1975·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered February 26, 1975, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The reasons for delay in furnishing a bill of particulars were satisfactorily explained by plaintiffs and, no prejudice having been shown, it was a proper exercise of discretion to permit the belated bill to be served and to deny the motion to dismiss. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered February 26, 1975, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The reasons for delay in furnishing a bill of particulars were satisfactorily explained by plaintiffs and, no prejudice having been shown, it was a proper exercise of discretion to permit the belated bill to be served and to deny the motion to dismiss. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.

Soto v. Scala, 49 A.D.2d 721, 374 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10654 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

49 A.D.2d 721 (Soto v. Scala) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.